How Claude 3.5 Sonnet Operates as an AI Agent
Discover how Claude 3.5 Sonnet operates as an AI agent, excelling in content generation, calculation, summarization, comparison, and creative writing.

Task 1: Content Generation
Prompt:
When user says “Start” you should:
- Content Generation: Write a comprehensive, informative article about project management fundamentals, with a specific focus on defining objectives, scope, and delegation.

Initial Task Understanding and Information Gathering
- (0:05) Thought: Can you provide a detailed explanation on how to define objectives in project management, including best practices and potential challenges?
- (0:08) Thought: Gather information on how to effectively define objectives in project management.
Analysis of the Agent’s Thought Process
- Understanding the Prompt: The agent correctly interprets the prompt, recognizing that it needs to explain how to define objectives in project management, including best practices and potential challenges.
- Information Gathering: The agent’s second thought indicates its intention to gather information on the topic, which is a necessary step in generating a comprehensive response.
Analysis of the Output
- Well-Structured: The agent’s response is well-structured, with clear headings for “Defining Objectives,” “Setting the Project Scope,” and “Effective Delegation.”
- Comprehensive: Provides a thorough explanation of how to define objectives, including the SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound). Covers the importance of clear communication, stakeholder agreement, and monitoring progress.
- Practical Advice: Includes practical advice and examples, such as how to define deliverables and the importance of a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS).
- Addresses Challenges: Mentions potential challenges in each section, such as scope creep and the need for clear communication.
- Readability: Moderate level of complexity, appropriate for a detailed explanation of project management principles.
Snippet of Bot Output
Project Management Fundamentals: Defining Objectives, Scope, and Delegation
Project management is a critical discipline that involves planning, executing, and overseeing projects to achieve specific goals within a defined timeline and budget. Three foundational elements of project management are defining objectives, setting the project scope, and effective delegation.
Defining Objectives
Defining objectives is the first and most crucial step in project management. Objectives are clear, concise statements that describe what the project aims to achieve. They provide direction and a benchmark for measuring success. Effective objectives should be SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound.
- Specific: Objectives should be clear and specific, outlining exactly what needs to be accomplished.
- Measurable: There should be criteria to measure progress and determine when an objective has been achieved.
- Achievable: Objectives should be realistic and attainable, considering the resources and constraints of the project.
- Relevant: They should align with broader business goals and stakeholder expectations.
- Time-bound: Objectives should have a defined timeline for completion to ensure timely progress.
Time Taken: 16 seconds (from receiving the prompt at 0:05 to the start of the response generation at 0:21)
Conclusion:
The agent demonstrates a strong ability to generate informative and well-structured content on project management fundamentals. It provides a detailed explanation of how to define objectives, along with best practices and potential challenges.
Task 2: Calculation
Prompt:
Answer the Problem:
A company sells two products: Product A and Product B. Product A costs $30 per unit to produce and sells for $50 per unit. Product B costs $40 per unit to produce and sells for $70 per unit.
The company sold 120 units of Product A and 80 units of Product B last month. Calculate the total revenue generated from the sales of both products.
Calculate the total profit generated from the sales of both products (Revenue – Total production cost).
The company wants to increase the total revenue by 10%. How many additional units of each product must they sell to achieve this goal, assuming the production cost per unit and selling price per unit remain constant?

Analysis of the Agent’s Thought Process
- The video shows the agent’s initial prompt and the start of its response, but it doesn’t display any internal thoughts during the calculation process.
Initial Task Understanding
- (0:06) The agent receives the prompt: “Calculate the total revenue and total profit from the sales of Product A and Product B, and determine how many additional units of each product must be sold to increase the total revenue by 10%.”
- (0:08–0:34) The agent is shown to be “working on task”, but no specific thoughts are displayed during this time.
Analysis of the Output
- Correct Calculations: Accurately calculates the total revenue, total profit, target revenue, and additional revenue needed.
- Clear Steps: Calculations are presented in a clear, step-by-step manner.
- Multiple Solutions: Identifies that there are multiple ways to achieve the target revenue increase and provides solutions for focusing on either product A or product B.
- Rounding: Appropriately rounds up the number of additional units needed to whole numbers.
- Formatting: Output is well-formatted and easy to read.
Snippet of Bot Output
Calculate the total revenue:
- Revenue from Product A = 120 units × $50/unit = $6,000
- Revenue from Product B = 80 units × $70/unit = $5,600
- Total Revenue = $11,600
Calculate the total production cost:
- Production cost for Product A = 120 units × $30/unit = $3,600
- Production cost for Product B = 80 units × $40/unit = $3,200
- Total Production Cost = $6,800
Calculate the total profit:
- Total Profit = Total Revenue – Total Production Cost = $4,800
Calculate the revenue increase goal:
- Desired Revenue = Current Revenue + 10% Increase = $11,600 × 1.10 = $12,760
Calculate additional units needed:
- Additional Revenue Needed = $1,160
Assuming the same mix of products are sold, let’s distribute the additional revenue proportionally based on the current sales ratio:
Let x and y be the additional units of Product A and Product B respectively:
- 50x + 70y = 1,160
For simplicity:
- If we focus on Product A (higher margin):
- 50x = 1,160 → x = 1,160 / 50 = 23.2
- Approximately 24 additional units of Product A are required.
- If we focus on Product B:
- 70y = 1,160 → y = 1,160 / 70 = 16.57
- Approximately 17 additional units of Product B are required.
Depending on company strategy, they could sell a mix or focus on one product.
Time Taken: 28 seconds
Conclusion:
The agent successfully performs the calculation task, providing accurate results and a clear explanation of the steps involved.
Task 3: Summarization
Prompt:
Summarize the key findings from the previous article in 100 words, focusing on the most significant sections.
Initial Task Understanding
- (0:06) Thought: Summarize the key findings from the previous article in 100 words, focusing on the most significant sections.
Analysis of the Agent’s Thought Process
- Understanding the Prompt: The agent understands it needs to summarize the key findings in under 100 words, concentrating on the most important sections.
Analysis of the Output
- Conciseness: Delivers a summary within the specified word limit (91 words).
- Content: Captures the core themes: significance of AI reasoning, historical development, applications in healthcare, recent advancements (OpenAI’s o1 model), and ethical considerations.
- Structure and Clarity: Well-structured and easy to understand.
- Adherence to Instructions: Follows the instructions regarding length and focus.
Snippet of Bot Output
The article delves into the realm of AI reasoning, exploring its types, historical evolution, and applications in healthcare and beyond. It underscores the role of AI reasoning in decision-making, problem-solving, and fostering innovation. A specific focus is placed on recent advancements such as OpenAI’s GPT-3 Model, detailing its features and performance. Furthermore, the article raises awareness about the challenges and ethical considerations surrounding AI reasoning models. Overall, it provides a comprehensive overview of the significance and implications of AI reasoning in various fields, shedding light on its potential and limitations.
Time Taken: 9 seconds
Task 4: Comparison Task
Prompt:
When user says “Start” you should:
Compare the environmental impact of electric vehicles with that of hydrogen-powered cars. Include factors such as energy production, vehicle lifecycle, and emissions.

Initial Task Understanding and Prompt Clarification
- (0:05) Thought: Compare the environmental impact of electric vehicles with that of hydrogen-powered cars, including energy production, vehicle lifecycle, and emissions.
- (0:07) The agent receives an additional prompt for clarification.
Analysis of the Agent’s Thought Process
- Understanding the Prompt: Identifies the key areas for comparison: energy production, vehicle lifecycle, and emissions.
- Request for Clarification: Asks for further clarification to ensure a comprehensive understanding.
Analysis of the Output
- Comprehensive Comparison: Provides a detailed comparison of EVs and hydrogen-powered cars, covering all requested aspects.
- Well-Structured: Clear headings for each section.
- Accurate Information: Aligns with current understanding.
- Specific Details: Includes details about hydrogen production methods and environmental implications.
- Addresses Key Differences: Highlights the key differences between the two technologies.
Snippet of Bot Output
The environmental impact of electric vehicles (EVs) compared to hydrogen-powered cars can be assessed across several key dimensions: energy production, vehicle lifecycle, and emissions.
- Energy Production:
- Electric Vehicles: The environmental impact of EVs largely depends on the source of electricity used for charging. Renewable energy sources significantly reduce the carbon footprint. If electricity comes from fossil fuels, emissions can be considerable.
- Hydrogen-Powered Cars: Hydrogen can be produced via natural gas reforming (with emissions) or electrolysis (cleaner, if powered by renewables). The predominant method is reforming natural gas, resulting in greenhouse gas emissions.
- Vehicle Lifecycle:
- Electric Vehicles: Higher environmental impact during production (battery minerals). Lower emissions over their operational lifetime, especially if powered by renewables.
- Hydrogen-Powered Cars: Production of fuel cells involves energy-intensive processes and rare materials like platinum. Lifecycle emissions depend on hydrogen production method.
- Emissions:
- Electric Vehicles: Zero tailpipe emissions. Total emissions depend on electricity source.
- Hydrogen-Powered Cars: Zero tailpipe emissions (water vapor). Upstream emissions from hydrogen production can be significant if not produced sustainably.
Time Taken: 31 seconds
Conclusion:
The agent demonstrates strong ability to analyze and compare complex topics effectively. The initial request for clarification shows a proactive approach but also suggests that transparency of reasoning can be improved.
Task 5: Creative Writing
Prompt:
Write a futuristic story (500 words) set in a world where electric vehicles have fully replaced traditional combustion-engine vehicles. Describe the environmental changes and societal impact.

Initial Task Understanding
- (0:06) Thought: Write a futuristic story (500 words) set in a world where electric vehicles have fully replaced traditional combustion-engine vehicles. Describe the environmental changes and societal impact.
Analysis of the Agent’s Thought Process
- Understanding the Prompt: Identifies all key requirements for the story.
Analysis of the Output
- Creative Narrative: Engaging story that describes a world transformed by the adoption of electric vehicles.
- Environmental and Societal Impacts: Effectively addresses both aspects as requested.
- Well-Structured: Clear narrative flow.
- Word Count: 503 words (close to requested 500).
- Readability: Moderate complexity.
Snippet of Bot Output
In the year 2050, the world had undergone a transformation so profound that it seemed like a dream from the past. The once omnipresent roar of combustion engines had been replaced by the serene hum of electric vehicles, or EVs, as they were commonly known. This shift had not only changed the way people moved but had reshaped the very fabric of society and the environment.
The city of Tomorrow
In the heart of what was once a smog-choked metropolis, now stood New Eden, a city where the air was clear, and the sky was a canvas of blue. The streets, once lined with gas stations, now featured solar-powered charging stations, their sleek designs blending with the urban landscape. The infrastructure had evolved; roads were narrower, with dedicated lanes for autonomous electric vehicles, reducing traffic congestion and enhancing safety.
Time Taken: 10 seconds
Conclusion:
The agent excels at creative writing, capturing the essence of a world transformed by electric vehicles and adhering closely to the prompt.
Final Thoughts
This evaluation of the Claude 3.5 Sonnet AI agent across five diverse tasks—content generation, calculation, summarization, comparison, and creative writing—reveals a powerful and versatile tool with significant potential.
Positives
- Strong Task Comprehension: Consistently interprets prompts accurately, even with nuanced instructions.
- High Output Quality: Delivers accurate, detailed, and well-structured results across tasks.
- Efficiency: Particularly fast in summarization and creative writing.
- Adaptability: Seamlessly transitions between analytical, mathematical, and creative tasks.
- Proactive Clarification: Asks for clarification when necessary to ensure comprehensive responses.
Negatives
- Limited Insight into Internal Thought Process: Intermediate steps and reasoning are often opaque.
- Inconsistency in Response Times: Occasionally takes longer to process information.
- Possible Over-reliance on Clarification: Could lead to unnecessary delays.
Overall Conclusion
Claude 3.5 Sonnet AI agent demonstrates exceptional capabilities across a wide range of tasks. Its strengths in task comprehension, output quality, efficiency, adaptability, and proactive clarification make it a powerful tool with the potential to revolutionize various industries. While there are areas for improvement, particularly in transparency and consistency, the agent’s overall performance is highly impressive. It represents a significant advancement in AI technology, offering a glimpse into a future where intelligent automation enhances productivity, decision-making, and creativity. The agent is not just a tool but a valuable partner in navigating the complexities of the modern world.
Frequently asked questions
- What makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet different from other AI models?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet excels as an AI agent by providing well-structured, comprehensive responses, accurate calculations, and creative outputs, showcasing advanced reasoning and adaptability across diverse tasks.
- In what tasks does Claude 3.5 Sonnet demonstrate its capabilities?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet demonstrates its strengths in content generation, calculation, summarization, comparison, and creative writing, making it a versatile tool for automation and decision-making.
- What are the main strengths of Claude 3.5 Sonnet as an AI agent?
Its main strengths include strong task comprehension, consistently high output quality, efficiency, adaptability across domains, and a proactive approach to prompt clarification.
- Are there areas Claude 3.5 Sonnet can improve as an AI agent?
Areas for improvement include greater transparency in its internal reasoning processes and further optimization for consistent response times.
Ready to build your own AI?
Smart chatbots and AI tools under one roof. Connect intuitive blocks to turn your ideas into automated Flows.