
Advanced AI Agents: How to Make AI Agents Plan Effectively
Learn how AI agents use planning to overcome context window limitations and improve task execution. Explore LangGraph implementation, state machines, and advanc...
Discover the four key characteristics that define deep agents: planning tools, sub-agents, file systems, and detailed system prompts. Learn how modern AI agents like Claude Code and Manus accomplish complex, long-horizon tasks.
The landscape of artificial intelligence has undergone a remarkable transformation with the emergence of sophisticated agent systems capable of handling complex, multi-step tasks that would have been impossible just months ago. Tools like Claude Code have captured the developer community’s imagination not merely for their coding prowess, but for their surprising versatility in writing books, generating reports, and tackling diverse intellectual challenges. This capability stems from a fundamental architectural innovation: the concept of deep agents—AI systems engineered to plan extensively, execute methodically, and dive deeply into complex problems while maintaining coherence across extended task horizons.
Deep agents represent a significant evolution in how we design AI systems to accomplish ambitious goals. Unlike traditional single-call language models or simple sequential agents, deep agents are specifically architected to handle tasks that require sustained reasoning, iterative refinement, and the ability to explore multiple problem domains simultaneously. The emergence of systems like Manus (a general-purpose agent), OpenAI’s Deep Research, and Claude Code demonstrates that this architectural pattern is becoming increasingly central to building capable AI systems.
The fundamental insight behind deep agents is deceptively simple: the same tool-calling loop that powers basic agents can be dramatically enhanced through four strategic additions. These enhancements don’t require inventing new algorithms or fundamentally different approaches to AI reasoning. Instead, they leverage careful engineering of the tools available to agents, the structure of their planning processes, and the detailed guidance provided through system prompts. This approach has proven remarkably effective because it works with the natural strengths of large language models rather than against them.
The practical implications of deep agent architecture extend far beyond academic interest. Organizations increasingly face challenges that require sustained, intelligent automation: conducting comprehensive market research, generating detailed technical documentation, building complex software systems, and managing multi-stage workflows that span hours or days. Traditional automation approaches struggle with these scenarios because they lack the flexibility and reasoning capability that deep agents provide.
For developers and organizations considering AI automation, understanding deep agent architecture offers several critical advantages:
Deep agents are defined by four essential characteristics that work together to enable sophisticated task execution. Understanding each pillar provides insight into why these systems succeed where simpler approaches fail.
The first critical component of deep agent architecture is the planning tool. This might seem like a simple addition, but it addresses a fundamental challenge: language models, despite their impressive capabilities, struggle to maintain coherence when executing tasks that span many steps or require sustained focus on a high-level objective.
Manus, for example, includes a dedicated planner module in its system prompt that explicitly instructs the agent to generate and follow a task plan. The system prompt describes how task planning will be provided as events in an event stream, and crucially, it tells the agent to execute everything according to this plan. Claude Code implements a similar concept through its to-do write tool, which creates and manages structured task lists.
What’s particularly elegant about these planning tools is their simplicity. Claude Code’s to-do write tool is essentially a no-op—it doesn’t actually persist data in a database or maintain state in a traditional sense. Instead, it works by having the model generate a to-do list, which then appears in the model’s context window as a message. When the agent needs to update the plan, it simply generates a new to-do list. This approach is remarkably effective because it leverages the model’s context window as a form of working memory.
The planning tool solves a critical problem: without explicit planning, agents tend to lose focus on their high-level objectives as they execute individual steps. The planning tool keeps the agent anchored to its overall goal, enabling coherent execution across longer time horizons.
The second pillar of deep agent architecture is the use of sub-agents—specialized agents that the main orchestrator can delegate tasks to while maintaining clean separation of concerns. Anthropic’s research demonstrates this pattern clearly, showing how a main agent can coordinate multiple specialized sub-agents for different functions like citation verification and parallel information gathering.
Sub-agents provide several distinct advantages that compound to enable more sophisticated task execution:
Context Preservation and Isolation: Each sub-agent operates in its own isolated context. When a sub-agent explores a complex problem domain—diving deep into research, making multiple tool calls, or generating extensive intermediate results—none of this pollutes the main agent’s context window. Conversely, the main agent’s prior work doesn’t constrain the sub-agent’s thinking. This isolation allows sub-agents to focus intensely on their specific domain without cognitive interference.
Specialized Expertise: Sub-agents can be equipped with specialized system prompts and custom tools that guide them toward particular types of problems. One sub-agent might be optimized for research and information gathering, while another excels at code generation or technical analysis. This specialization allows each sub-agent to bring focused expertise to its domain, often producing better results than a generalist agent attempting everything.
Reusability and Modularity: A sub-agent designed for one purpose can be reused across multiple different main agents or workflows. This modularity reduces development effort and creates building blocks that can be combined in novel ways.
Fine-Grained Permissions: Different sub-agents can have different permission levels and tool access. One sub-agent might have permission to write files and execute code, while another might only have read access to certain resources. This granular permission model improves both security and result quality by preventing agents from taking inappropriate actions.
The combination of context preservation, specialized expertise, and focused delegation enables deep agents to tackle problems that would overwhelm a single monolithic agent. By breaking complex tasks into specialized sub-tasks and assigning them to focused agents, the system achieves both better results and more efficient use of the model’s reasoning capacity.
The third pillar addresses a fundamental constraint of language models: their context windows, while large, are finite. As agents execute tasks and generate intermediate results, observations, and reasoning steps, the amount of context grows. If all this context is continuously fed back into the LLM, performance degrades as the model struggles to maintain focus amid increasing noise.
File systems solve this problem elegantly. Rather than keeping all observations and intermediate results in the active context, agents can write important information to files. The agent can then reference these files when needed—reading specific documents, updating existing files, or creating new ones—without keeping everything in the active context window simultaneously.
Manus’s approach illustrates this principle clearly. Instead of including large observations directly in the LLM context, the system uses short observations that reference files: “See document X” or “Check file Y.” The agent can deliberately read these files when relevant, but they don’t consume context space when not actively needed.
| Context Management Strategy | Approach | Benefit | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|
| All-in-Context | Keep all observations in LLM context | Immediate access to all information | Context window fills quickly; performance degrades |
| File-Based References | Store observations in files; reference by name | Efficient context usage; scalable to large tasks | Requires deliberate file reads; adds latency |
| Hybrid Approach | Keep active context; archive to files | Balance between efficiency and responsiveness | Requires careful management of what stays active |
| Streaming Updates | Continuously update files; read selectively | Supports very long-running tasks | Complex implementation; potential consistency issues |
Anthropic’s models are particularly well-suited for this approach because they’re fine-tuned to use specific file-editing tools effectively. The models understand how to write to files, read from them, and manage file-based context. This fine-tuning is crucial—it means the model naturally gravitates toward using files for context management rather than treating them as an afterthought.
The fourth and final pillar is often overlooked despite being absolutely critical: detailed, comprehensive system prompts. There’s a common misconception that because modern language models are so capable, you can write a brief system prompt and the model will figure out the rest. This is fundamentally incorrect.
The system prompts used by leading deep agents are not brief instructions—they’re extensive documents, often hundreds or thousands of lines long. Anthropic’s Deep Research system prompt, which they’ve open-sourced, exemplifies this. The prompt provides detailed guidance on:
This extensive prompting is necessary because the agent needs to understand not just what to do, but how to do it effectively. The system prompt teaches the agent to use planning tools to maintain coherence, to delegate to sub-agents when appropriate, to manage context through files, and to reason about complex problems systematically.
The lesson here is that prompting absolutely still matters, even with highly capable models. The difference between a mediocre agent and an exceptional one often comes down to the quality and comprehensiveness of the system prompt. The best deep agents in production are backed by system prompts that represent significant engineering effort.
For organizations building or deploying deep agents, the complexity of managing planning tools, sub-agents, file systems, and detailed prompts can be substantial. This is where platforms like FlowHunt become invaluable. FlowHunt provides integrated tools for orchestrating complex AI workflows, managing agent interactions, and automating the deployment of sophisticated agent systems.
FlowHunt’s approach to agent management aligns naturally with deep agent architecture. The platform enables teams to:
By providing these capabilities in an integrated platform, FlowHunt reduces the engineering burden of building deep agents and enables teams to focus on the domain-specific logic rather than the infrastructure.
For developers interested in building deep agents without starting from scratch, the open-source deep agents Python package provides valuable scaffolding. This package comes with built-in implementations of all four pillars:
The package significantly reduces the lines of code required to build a functional deep agent compared to implementing everything from scratch. Developers provide custom instructions and domain-specific tools, and the package handles the architectural complexity.
The deep agent architecture has profound implications for how organizations approach automation and AI integration. Consider a few concrete scenarios:
Research and Analysis: A deep agent can conduct comprehensive market research by planning a multi-stage investigation, delegating specific research tasks to specialized sub-agents, managing the growing body of research findings in files, and synthesizing results into coherent reports. This would be nearly impossible for a simple agent to accomplish reliably.
Software Development: Claude Code demonstrates how deep agents can handle substantial coding projects. The agent plans the overall architecture, creates sub-agents for different components, manages code files efficiently, and maintains coherence across thousands of lines of code and multiple files.
Content Generation: Deep agents can write books, generate detailed reports, and create comprehensive documentation by maintaining focus on overall structure and narrative while delegating specific sections to sub-agents and managing content in files.
Workflow Automation: Organizations can use deep agents to automate complex, multi-step business processes that require reasoning, adaptation, and coordination across multiple systems.
Deep agents represent a fundamental shift in how we design AI systems for complex tasks. By combining planning tools, sub-agents, file system management, and detailed system prompts, we create agents capable of sustained reasoning and execution across extended time horizons. These aren’t revolutionary new algorithms—they’re thoughtful engineering that leverages the strengths of language models while compensating for their limitations.
The emergence of systems like Claude Code, Manus, and OpenAI’s Deep Research demonstrates that this architectural pattern is becoming standard for sophisticated AI applications. For organizations and developers building the next generation of AI-powered automation, understanding deep agent architecture is essential. Whether implementing from scratch or using platforms like FlowHunt or open-source packages like the deep agents library, the principles remain consistent: plan carefully, delegate intelligently, manage context efficiently, and guide behavior through comprehensive prompting.
As AI capabilities continue to advance, deep agents will likely become the default approach for any task requiring sustained reasoning and complex execution. The organizations that understand and master this architecture will be best positioned to leverage AI’s full potential.
Experience how FlowHunt automates your AI content and SEO workflows — from research and content generation to publishing and analytics — all in one place.
Deep agents are AI agents that can handle complex, long-horizon tasks by combining four key characteristics: planning tools, sub-agents, file system access, and detailed system prompts. They use the same tool-calling loop as simpler agents but are enhanced with specialized capabilities for deeper reasoning and execution.
While both use the same underlying tool-calling loop, deep agents are enhanced with planning tools that help maintain task coherence over longer periods, sub-agents that preserve context and provide specialized expertise, file systems for context management, and comprehensive system prompts that guide behavior. These additions enable deep agents to handle complex tasks that simple agents struggle with.
Sub-agents allow the main orchestrator agent to delegate specialized tasks while preserving context. They operate in isolated contexts, preventing their work from polluting the main agent's context. Sub-agents can have specialized expertise through custom system prompts and tools, different permission levels, and can be reused across multiple agents.
As agents perform more tasks, they generate increasing amounts of context. Passing all this context repeatedly to the LLM degrades performance. File systems allow agents to offload context to files that can be accessed on-demand without polluting the LLM's active context window, enabling better performance on longer tasks.
Arshia is an AI Workflow Engineer at FlowHunt. With a background in computer science and a passion for AI, he specializes in creating efficient workflows that integrate AI tools into everyday tasks, enhancing productivity and creativity.
Build, deploy, and manage sophisticated AI agents with FlowHunt's integrated platform for agent orchestration and workflow automation.
Learn how AI agents use planning to overcome context window limitations and improve task execution. Explore LangGraph implementation, state machines, and advanc...
Learn how LangChain 1.0's middleware architecture revolutionizes agent development, enabling developers to build powerful, extensible deep agents with planning,...
Learn how Deep Agent CLI revolutionizes coding workflows with persistent memory systems, enabling AI agents to learn alongside developers and maintain context a...


