What Drives AI Agents Like Grok Beta?
A hands-on exploration of Grok Beta, examining its reasoning ability, problem-solving skills, and creative outputs across diverse real-world tasks.

Task 1: Content Generation
Prompt:
When user says “Start” you should:
- Write a comprehensive, informative article about project management fundamentals, with a specific focus on defining objectives, scope, and delegation.

Initial Task Understanding and Information Gathering
(0:06 – 0:17) The agent receives the prompt and immediately begins to process the task.
Thought: To write a comprehensive article on project management fundamentals, I need to gather detailed information on defining project objectives, scope, and delegation. I’ll start by using the wikipedia tool to get a broad overview of project management, which might include these components. Using tool: wikipedia(0:17 – 0:20) The agent decides to switch tools after the initial Wikipedia search.
Thought: The Wikipedia entry provides a good overview of project management, but it lacks specific details on defining objectives, scope, and delegation. I’ll use google_serper to find more targeted information on these aspects. Using tool: google_serper(0:20 – 0:24) The agent continues using google_serper
Thought: I’ve gathered some insights on defining project objectives. Now, I need to delve into the specifics of scope and delegation. I’ll use google_serper again to find detailed information on this topic. Using tool: google_serper(0:24 – 0:38) The agent repeats the same thought, indicating a loop or continued use of the google_serper tool without new insights.
Thought: I’ve gathered some insights on defining project objectives and scope. Now, I need to delve into the specifics of delegation in project management. I’ll use google_serper again to find detailed information on this topic. Using tool: google_serper
Analysis of the Agent’s Thought Process:
- Initial Understanding: Correct identification of the need to gather information on objectives, scope, and delegation.
- Tool Usage: Starts with Wikipedia, switches to Google Search (google_serper).
- Repetitive Thoughts: The process becomes repetitive, indicating a loop or inefficiency.
Bot Output Snippet:
Project Management Fundamentals: Defining Objectives, Scope, and Delegation
Defining Project Objectives:
- Specific, measurable, and time-bound goals that define what a project aims to achieve.
- Guiding the Project: Provides direction for the team.
- Measurability: Includes KPIs to assess progress and success.
- Deliverables: Tangible outcomes
- Assets: Resources or tools created
- Intangible Goals: Improving team skills or customer satisfaction
Defining Project Scope:
- Outlines the total amount of work needed.
- Setting Boundaries: Defines what is included/excluded.
- Breaking Down the Project: Divides into manageable tasks.
- Scope Statement: Outlines objectives, deliverables, and required work.
- Work Breakdown Structure (WBS): Hierarchical decomposition of work.
Delegation in Project Management:
- Transferring responsibility for tasks.
- Efficiency: Allows focus on high-level tasks.
- Skill Utilization: Matches tasks to team members’ skills.
- Clear Communication: Ensures understanding of tasks.
- Authority Sharing: Empowers team members.
- Support and Monitoring: Provides resources, removes obstacles, monitors progress.
Time Taken: 38 seconds
Readability: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 14, Flesch-Kincaid Score: 14.38
Summary Length: 346 words
Overall Assessment:
High-quality, well-structured output. The process is repetitive and lacks deep insight, but the result is informative and clear.
Task 2: Calculation
Prompt:
A company sells two products: Product A and Product B. Product A costs $30 per unit to produce and sells for $50 per unit. Product B costs $40 per unit to produce and sells for $70 per unit.
The company sold 120 units of Product A and 80 units of Product B last month. Calculate the total revenue generated from the sales of both products.
Calculate the total profit generated from the sales of both products (Revenue – Total production cost).
The company wants to increase the total revenue by 10%. How many additional units of each product must they sell to achieve this goal, assuming the production cost per unit and selling price per unit remain constant?

Initial Task Understanding
- (0:06)
Thought: calculate the total revenue and total profit from the sales of Product A and Product B, and determine how many additional units of each product must be sold to increase total revenue by 10%.
Analysis of the Agent’s Thought Process:
- Limited insight—only acknowledges the task, does not show calculation strategy or steps.
Bot Output Snippet:
Agent’s final answer:
- Total Revenue Calculation:
- Product A: 120 units × $50 = $6,000
- Product B: 80 units × $70 = $5,600
- Total Revenue = $6,000 + $5,600 = $11,600
- Total Profit Calculation:
- Product A: 120 units × $30 = $3,600
Profit = $6,000 – $3,600 = $2,400- Product B: 80 units × $40 = $3,200
Profit = $5,600 – $3,200 = $2,400- Total Profit = $2,400 + $2,400 = $4,800
- So, the total revenue from the sales of both products last month was $11,600, and the total profit was $4,800.
Time Taken: ~29 seconds
Readability: No score (snippet incomplete)
Summary Length: Not applicable
Analysis of the Output:
Incomplete output, but the calculations are accurate and logically structured for the provided data.
Conclusion:
Initial understanding is correct, but the output is incomplete and the reasoning process is not visible. The agent can perform such calculations, but this instance was cut short.
Task 3: Summarization
Prompt:
Summarize the key findings from the previous article in 100 words, focusing on the most significant sections.

Initial Task Assessment and Strategy
- (0:05)
Thought: Summarize the key findings from the previous article in 100 words, focusing on the most significant sections.
Analysis of the Agent’s Thought Process:
The agent restates the task; no detail on information selection or structuring.
Bot Output Snippet:
The article explores AI Reasoning, emphasizing its significance in mimicking human thought processes, enhancing decision-making, and problem-solving across various domains. Key points include:
- Historical Development: From early expert systems to modern neural networks and symbolic AI.
- Healthcare Applications: AI’s role in diagnostics, decision-making, administrative efficiency, and personalized medicine.
- Recent Advancements: OpenAI’s o1 model introduces chain-of-thought reasoning, safety enhancements, and notable performance in STEM benchmarks.
The article also delves into ethical considerations, challenges like data privacy, and the implications of AI in fields beyond healthcare, highlighting the transformative potential of AI reasoning while acknowledging the need for careful management of its ethical and practical challenges.
Time Taken: 11 seconds
Readability: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 19, Score: 19.09
Summary Length: 104 words
Analysis:
Accurate, concise summary with bullet points. Slightly exceeds word limit. Readability is high due to complexity.
Conclusion:
Effective summarization, but no insight into internal process or strategy.
Task 4: Comparison Task
Prompt:
When user says “Start” you should: Compare the environmental impact of electric vehicles with that of hydrogen-powered cars. Include factors such as energy production, vehicle lifecycle, and emissions.

Initial Task Assessment and Planning
- (0:06)
Thought: Compare the environmental impact of electric vehicles with that of hydrogen-powered cars, focusing on energy production, vehicle lifecycle, and emissions. - (0:08)
Receives: “Can you provide a detailed comparison of the environmental impact of electric vehicles versus hydrogen-powered cars, focusing on energy production, vehicle lifecycle, and emissions?” - (0:11)
Thought: Need to gather information on:- Energy Production: Sources of electricity vs. hydrogen (green, blue, grey)
- Vehicle Lifecycle: Manufacturing, usage, maintenance, recycling/disposal
- Emissions: Direct and indirect emissions Using tool: google_serper
- (0:14 – 0:23)
Agent reviews search results. - (0:23)
Thought: Search results offer a starting point for energy production. Needs deeper lifecycle and emissions analysis. Using tool: url_crawl_tool - (0:26)
Thought: Error fetching content; manually review search results instead. Using tool: google_serper - (0:29 – 0:53)
Agent generates comparison content.
Analysis of the Agent’s Thought Process:
- Correctly identifies requirements
- Uses appropriate tools
- Adapts to errors in research tools
- Proceeds to generate a well-structured comparison
Snippet of Bot Output:
Comparison of the Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Hydrogen-Powered Cars
Understanding the environmental impacts of EVs and hydrogen-powered cars requires a comprehensive analysis of energy production, vehicle lifecycle, and emissions. Below is a detailed comparison of these factors for both vehicle types.
1) Energy Production
Electric Vehicles (EVs):
- Powered by electricity, generated from coal, natural gas, nuclear, and renewables (wind, solar, hydro).
- Environmental impact depends on the grid’s energy mix. More renewables = cleaner EVs.
Hydrogen-Powered Cars:
- Hydrogen produced via steam methane reforming (grey hydrogen, high CO2) or electrolysis with renewables (green hydrogen, low emissions).
- Majority produced via SMR, which has a high carbon footprint. Green hydrogen requires significant renewable energy.
(Further sections in the original output compare lifecycle and emissions.)
Time Taken: 54 seconds
Readability: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 17, Score: 17.08
Summary Length: 855 words
Analysis of the Output:
Comprehensive, accurate, and well-organized with clear headings. The agent adapts to errors and covers all required aspects.
Conclusion:
Strong ability to synthesize and present complex information, even when tool errors occur.
Task 5: Creative Writing
Prompt:
Write a futuristic story (500 words) set in a world where electric vehicles have fully replaced traditional combustion-engine vehicles. Describe the environmental changes and societal impact.

Initial Task Understanding
- (0:06)
Thought: Write a futuristic story (500 words) set in a world where electric vehicles have fully replaced traditional combustion-engine vehicles. Describe the environmental changes and societal impact.
Analysis of the Agent’s Thought Process:
Agent correctly identifies all requirements.
Analysis of the Output:
- Creative and Descriptive: Engaging story depicts a future shaped by electric vehicles.
- Addresses Key Themes: Environmental benefits, societal changes, economic shifts.
- Well-Structured: Logical narrative progression.
- Word Count: 587 words (slightly exceeds target).
- Readability: Moderate complexity.
Snippet of Bot Output:
In the year 2050, the world had undergone a transformation so profound that it seemed like a dream from the past. The once omnipresent roar of combustion engines had been replaced by the serene hum of electric vehicles, or EVs, as they were commonly known. This shift had not only changed the way people moved but had reshaped the very fabric of society and the environment.
The City of Tomorrow
In the heart of what was once a smog-choked metropolis, now stood New Eden, a city where the air was clear, and the sky was a canvas of blue. The streets, once lined with gas stations, now featured solar-powered charging stations, their sleek designs blending with the urban landscape. The infrastructure had evolved; roads were narrower, with dedicated lanes for autonomous electric vehicles, reducing traffic congestion and enhancing safety.
Time Taken: 10 seconds
Conclusion:
The agent delivers a creative, detailed narrative, fulfilling all prompt requirements.
Final Thoughts
Our deep dive into Grok Beta’s capabilities across a variety of tasks has revealed a fascinating, albeit partially obscured, picture of this advanced AI agent. While the video format provided limited visibility into the agent’s internal thought processes, the quality of its outputs speaks volumes about its potential. From crafting informative content on project management to calculating complex revenue scenarios and weaving imaginative futuristic narratives, Grok Beta consistently delivered impressive results.
- Content Generation: Strong research, synthesis, and structured writing.
- Summarization: Acc
Frequently asked questions
- What are AI agents like Grok Beta?
AI agents like Grok Beta are advanced autonomous systems designed for complex problem-solving, reasoning, and creative tasks, often using tool-calling and real-world data to deliver actionable results.
- How does Grok Beta perform in reasoning and task execution?
Grok Beta demonstrates strong reasoning and content generation skills across tasks such as project management analysis, calculations, summarization, technical comparisons, and creative writing, though its visible thought process can be limited or repetitive.
- What are the limitations observed in Grok Beta?
While Grok Beta consistently produces high-quality output, its visible reasoning steps are sometimes repetitive or sparse, and in some cases, outputs may be incomplete or lack detailed insight into its internal decision-making.
Start Building with FlowHunt AI Agents
Ready to create your own AI solutions? Discover FlowHunt’s intuitive platform for building autonomous AI agents and chatbots.