What are adversarial examples?

Adversarial examples are carefully crafted inputs designed to fool a machine learning model into making incorrect predictions. For image classifiers, this might be an image with imperceptible pixel changes that causes misclassification. For LLMs, adversarial examples include crafted prompts that trigger unsafe outputs or bypass safety filters.

How does adversarial ML relate to LLM security?

LLM security is a specialized application of adversarial ML principles. Prompt injection and jailbreaking are adversarial attacks on LLMs — crafted inputs designed to cause incorrect or harmful behavior. Adversarial suffixes (computed strings that reliably jailbreak models) are a direct application of classical adversarial example research to language models.

What is adversarial training?

Adversarial training is a defense technique that improves model robustness by including adversarial examples in the training dataset. The model learns to correctly handle inputs that were previously adversarial. For LLMs, this is incorporated into safety alignment training — models are trained on examples of attacks to learn to resist them.

Adversarial Machine Learning

Adversarial machine learning studies attacks that deliberately manipulate AI model inputs to cause incorrect outputs, and the defenses against them. Techniques range from imperceptible image perturbations that fool classifiers to crafted text prompts that hijack LLM behavior.

Adversarial machine learning is the study of attacks that cause AI models to produce incorrect, unsafe, or unintended outputs by deliberately manipulating their inputs. It encompasses both the attack techniques that exploit model vulnerabilities and the defensive approaches that make models more robust against them.

The Adversarial Machine Learning Landscape

Adversarial ML emerged from computer vision research in the early 2010s, when researchers discovered that adding imperceptibly small perturbations to images could cause state-of-the-art classifiers to misclassify them with high confidence. A panda becomes a gibbon; a stop sign becomes a speed limit sign — with pixel changes invisible to human observers.

This discovery revealed that neural networks, despite their impressive performance, learn statistical patterns that can be exploited rather than robust semantic understanding. The same underlying principle — that models can be systematically fooled by carefully designed inputs — applies across all AI modalities, including language models.

Adversarial Attacks by Category

Evasion Attacks

The model is attacked at inference time with inputs designed to cause misclassification or unexpected behavior. In computer vision, these are adversarial images. In NLP and LLMs, evasion attacks include:

Prompt injection : Crafted text that overrides system instructions
Jailbreaking : Prompts that bypass safety guardrails
Token smuggling : Encoding manipulations that evade content filters
Adversarial suffixes: Algorithmically computed strings that reliably cause harmful outputs

Poisoning Attacks

The model or its data sources are attacked during training or retrieval. Examples include:

Training data poisoning: Injecting malicious examples into training datasets to introduce backdoors or bias
RAG poisoning : Contaminating retrieval knowledge bases with malicious content
Fine-tuning attacks: Poisoning domain-specific fine-tuning datasets

Model Extraction / Theft

Adversaries use repeated queries to extract information about a model’s decision boundaries, reconstruct training data, or replicate model capabilities — a competitive intelligence threat for proprietary AI systems.

Membership Inference

Attackers determine whether specific data was used in training, potentially exposing whether sensitive personal information was included in training datasets.

Adversarial Attacks on LLMs: A Specialized Domain

Large language models face adversarial attacks that are distinct from classical ML adversarial examples:

Natural language attacks are human-readable. Unlike image perturbations (imperceptible pixel changes), effective LLM adversarial attacks often use coherent natural language — making them much harder to distinguish from legitimate inputs.

The attack surface is the instruction interface. LLMs are designed to follow instructions. Adversarial attacks exploit this by crafting inputs that look like legitimate instructions to the model but achieve attacker goals.

Gradient-based attacks are viable. For open-source or white-box access models, attackers can compute adversarial suffixes using gradient descent — the same technique used to find adversarial image perturbations. Research has demonstrated that these computed strings transfer surprisingly well to proprietary models.

Social engineering analog. Many LLM adversarial attacks resemble social engineering more than classical ML attacks — exploiting model tendencies toward helpfulness, consistency, and authority compliance.

Defenses and Countermeasures

Adversarial Training

Including adversarial examples in training improves robustness. Safety alignment training for LLMs incorporates examples of prompt injection and jailbreaking attempts, teaching models to resist them. However, this arms race dynamic means new attacks regularly emerge that bypass current training.

Certified Robustness

Formal verification techniques provide mathematical guarantees that a model will correctly classify inputs within a certain perturbation bound. Currently limited to smaller models and simpler input domains, but an active research area.

Input Preprocessing and Validation

Sanitizing inputs to remove or neutralize potential adversarial components before they reach the model. For LLMs, this includes detecting injection patterns and anomalous input structures.

Ensemble Methods

Using multiple models and requiring agreement reduces adversarial transferability. An attack that fools one model is less likely to fool all models in an ensemble.

Monitoring and Anomaly Detection

Detecting adversarial inputs at runtime by identifying statistical anomalies or behavioral patterns inconsistent with normal use.

Application to AI Chatbot Security

For organizations deploying AI chatbots, adversarial ML principles inform:

AI red teaming : Systematic adversarial probing of AI systems
Robustness assessment: Testing whether safety behaviors hold under adversarial conditions
Input validation design: Understanding what classes of adversarial inputs exist informs what to validate
Defense depth: No single defense is robust; layered controls are required

Prompt Injection — adversarial attacks targeting LLM instruction following
Jailbreaking AI — adversarial safety guardrail bypass
Token Smuggling — encoding-based adversarial filter evasion
AI Red Teaming — systematic adversarial security testing
LLM Security — comprehensive AI security practices

Frequently asked questions

: Adversarial examples are carefully crafted inputs designed to fool a machine learning model into making incorrect predictions. For image classifiers, this might be an image with imperceptible pixel changes that causes misclassification. For LLMs, adversarial examples include crafted prompts that trigger unsafe outputs or bypass safety filters.
: LLM security is a specialized application of adversarial ML principles. Prompt injection and jailbreaking are adversarial attacks on LLMs — crafted inputs designed to cause incorrect or harmful behavior. Adversarial suffixes (computed strings that reliably jailbreak models) are a direct application of classical adversarial example research to language models.
: Adversarial training is a defense technique that improves model robustness by including adversarial examples in the training dataset. The model learns to correctly handle inputs that were previously adversarial. For LLMs, this is incorporated into safety alignment training — models are trained on examples of attacks to learn to resist them.

Test Your AI System's Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial vulnerabilities in AI chatbots go beyond classic ML attacks. Our assessments cover prompt injection, jailbreaking, and all LLM-specific adversarial techniques.

Book a Security Assessment Book a Demo

Learn more

OWASP LLM Top 10

The OWASP LLM Top 10 is the industry-standard list of the 10 most critical security and safety risks for applications built on large language models, covering p...

Mar 12, 2026 5 min read

OWASP LLM Top 10 AI Security +3

LLM Security

LLM security encompasses the practices, techniques, and controls used to protect large language model deployments from a unique class of AI-specific threats inc...

Mar 12, 2026 4 min read

LLM Security AI Security +3

AI Penetration Testing

AI penetration testing is a structured security assessment of AI systems — including LLM chatbots, autonomous agents, and RAG pipelines — using simulated attack...

Mar 12, 2026 4 min read

AI Penetration Testing AI Security +3

Adversarial Machine Learning

The Adversarial Machine Learning Landscape